“Disseminator of Misinformation” : Someone who disagrees and therefore should not be listened to.
Many people have expressed the hope that we will be wiser when the next pandemic hits. Well, important knowledge has emerged regarding the effects of pandemic policies on children.
Below, I am excerpting from a recent article in order to facilitate a quicker read. The excerpts are direct quotes.
“While Dr. Noble’s early concerns were dismissed, today there is no shortage of articles and studies documenting the harm caused by COVID-19 school policies over the past two and a half years. The number of ER visits in 2021 by adolescent girls for suspected suicide attempts was 51% higher than during the same period in early 2019. Skyrocketing violence statistics involving young men, including a spate of shootings, may also be traceable to mental illnesses exacerbated by the enforced isolation of COVID-19.”
“One survey found that the rate of chronically absent students nationwide is now 22%, 2.7 times what it was before school closures. In New York City, 4 out of 10 students are now chronically absent; in Los Angeles nearly half of all students are chronically absent. These statistics indicate an instructional system that in many cases has simply ceased to function.” (My comment: maybe now would be a good time to look at what was wrong with it in the first place.)
“Overall, the youngest children were most profoundly impacted by lockdowns and school disruptions, and some of them now lack basic life skills.”
“As the severity of these repercussions comes to light, some outlets—notably those that most aggressively advocated for lockdowns and masking—have been eager to suggest that we are now aware of the overwhelmingly negative consequences of these policies thanks to “new research” that has only just become available to fair-minded people, who can therefore be forgiven for having adopted the course they did. But to many doctors and scientists, the damage to kids caused by COVID-19 panic was neither inevitable nor surprising. Rather, it was the result of the public health establishment’s conscious choice to eschew rational cost-benefit analysis in favor of pet cultural theories and political gamesmanship. For those who applied the scientific method to the available evidence, the consequences were already clear just a few weeks into the pandemic. “It was not at all true that people in healthcare and public health were unaware of what was going on with children,” Dr. Noble told me. “They were not ignorant.””
“What happened to the United States’ kids was not the result of an innocent mistake. It was the product of a concerted campaign of censorship and demonization of dissenting voices in support of premises that turned out to be wildly harmful to children. Scientists, doctors, and parents who urged schools to reopen based on available evidence were systematically ignored and silenced by politicians, public health bureaucrats, and legions of dedicated online COVID-19 activists, while the most vulnerable children in U.S. society suffered the consequences. Only by telling the story of how that betrayal happened is it possible to start understanding the why.”
“When Sweden kept schools open for children up to age 16 without masks in the spring of 2020, for example, not a single child died, and teachers were not at elevated risk for severe COVID-19.”
“Some commentators and institutions claimed that school-reopening efforts were a product of far-right Trumpism, scummy ulterior motives, and racism. “The push to reopen schools is rooted in sexism, racism, and misogyny,” the Chicago Teachers Union’s Twitter account tweeted in December 2020.”
“Dr. Duriseti told me that since the start of the pandemic, even with 35% of his overall patient volume being pediatrics, he had seen only one patient under 18 with the bilateral patchy infiltrates that are characteristic of severe COVID-19. On the other hand, there was clear indication of a youth mental health crisis. “I saw a spike in psychiatric visits for sure,” he said. “But what I really saw that was most concerning was a spike in more serious suicide attempts.” For Dr. Duriseti, it was “brutally obvious” that school closures were a catastrophic error. “I really bristle at the notion that this was not knowable, just by simple inferencing, and by this thing we call history,” he said. “People have researched these things before.””
“In the first week of August 2020, Dr. Shveta Raju, an internal medicine primary care physician, wondered why her children’s school district in Georgia was closed when the neighboring district had reopened. Why, she asked, was a fraternity house open in the same neighborhood where a kindergarten was closed? Although she proactively advocated for in-person school reopening in her community, Dr. Raju doesn’t think enough physicians did, due in part to institutional policies. Almost 70% of U.S. doctors work for hospitals or corporations as opposed to independently or in small practices—a tremendous shift from just 20 years ago. “Preserving the independence of physicians is really critical,” she told me. “Part of it is that physicians should be able to maintain their voice regardless of where they practice.”
“Laws or protections, Dr. Raju said, should be put in place to prevent employers from silencing them. Instead, the trend is moving in the opposite direction. The California state legislature is now considering a bill that would threaten doctors with disciplinary action if they share anything the medical board deems “misinformation.” This approach to alternative perspectives is exactly what needlessly left millions of American children out of school. It is not “misinformation,” but an official culture of censorship and credentialism that produced immense suffering.”
“I think people outside of science and academia need to realize how much physicians and scientists have been silenced this pandemic for standing up against things like school closures,” she said.
“There was “a small cartel of experts who controlled the policy, who controlled the messaging, who controlled even who was allowed to participate in this debate or discussion,” Dr. Bhattacharya said. “We can never let that happen again.””
“All of these supposed mitigation measures are ultimately justified through the idea that schools were fundamentally dangerous in 2020, when in reality they remained among the safest places for children and teachers to be throughout the pandemic.”
“The media’s recent discovery of the self-evident harms done to kids, is, for Dr. Duriseti, “the height of gaslighting.” It’s not enough just to document these harms, he said. “Apologies are in order. Accountability is in order.” What this accountability might look like is still an open question.”
Most of us have thought of California as as cool place. That reputation ends here. That a doctor can lose her license for disagreeing with public health policy is a big step in an incredibly wrong direction. (Maybe not surprising in one of the 27 American states that still has the death penalty.)
“Pan is a pediatrician who also has backed controversial legislation to expand the reach of vaccinations, most recently by proposing to end a personal belief exemption in school-based COVID-19 vaccination requirements. Low also has promoted legislation that last fall helped draw more than 1,000 people to the state Capitol in Sacramento to oppose vaccine mandates.”
“Dr. Nick Sawyer, an emergency room doctor with the advocacy group No License for Disinformation, said Low’s bill is aimed at “a very small number of very well-coordinated, well-funded and very, very active minority of physicians who are spreading the type of misinformation that is not nuanced at all.”” (My comment: this is total bullshit.)
“Among other things, in order to impose discipline, Low’s bill would require the medical board to determine that a doctor’s disinformation prompted a patient to decline COVID-19 prevention or treatment that was not justified by the patient’s medical history or condition.”
“Pan said the board would likely use a peer review process to establish a standard of care. If the board alleges a violation, medical experts would then review whether the doctor has violated that standard.”
“The California Medical Association hasn’t taken a position on Low’s bill. But the association’s president, Dr. Robert E. Wailes, said in a statement that misinformation has prolonged the pandemic, “making the work of our frontline health care workers more difficult and dangerous while harming community health.””
“The legislation differs from efforts in some other states like Florida and Tennessee, where Republican lawmakers have resisted doctor discipline proposals.”
C. Brandon Ogbunu, a computational biologist and assistant professor at Yale University wrote in September 2020 that he was disappointed in the responses of American universities to the Covid crisis.
He claims that their mishandling of campus re-openings shows them falling well short of the noble ideals they are supposed to represent. He accuses universities of blaming students for outbreaks of the virus on campus rather than acknowledging their own misguided decisions and dubious motivations.
In his fanciful description of the university world he says:
“College has endured as a meaningful rite of passage for millions of young people for generations because of the grander lessons on life it instills, the ones that prepare us for being adults and professionals.
Yes, college is supposed to teach us how to deconstruct a piece of literature, think about our political reality, analyze genome data, and build robots. But more than that, it is supposed to teach young people how to think critically and make hard decisions. The reason that millions of talented young people stay in college, even when they have the skills to enter the workforce early, is that college teaches you that patience will pay off in the long run.
In college, we meet collaborators, life partners, and band mates. In the process, we learn how to trust people, conceive of a plan and execute it, make mistakes, own up to them, and adapt. These trials are supposed to be training data for what life as an independent adult will be like. Whatever the specific lessons, the most primal function of college is to set a good example. “
He laments that his own students, who had suffered the effects of the 2016 election and the Covid-19 outbreak were now further disillusioned by universities’ inept attempts to continue offering courses with limited risk.
In a parental voice he apologizes saying:
“Early in the American phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, I witnessed what generational damage to hopes and dreams looked like. But as it was still March, I was optimistic that there was a solution on the way, if not for the pandemic, then for the eroding expectations of young people.
Six months later, my colleagues and I have done far worse than nothing: We’ve facilitated the spread of nihilism to future generations of college students, who have not only been robbed of the essential lessons of a college experience, but have learned far too early that they shouldn’t trust grown-ups, as we are often the ones who have the most to learn.”
Yale University’s motto, Lux et Veritas (Latin for “Light and Truth”), is not unlike others’. It represents the lofty ideals of all such institutions. While such aspirations are important they often contrast some of the realities on the ground.
As a first-time-away-from-home experience for many young people university life offers a new-found freedom to let loose. Exuberant drinking is almost a hallmark of many campuses. As are other forms of libertine behavior. While these are not necessarily unworthy components of a student life they are well removed from the lofty goals proclaimed in the university’s glossy brochures.
On the faculty side self-interest and intense competition often infect the pursuit of pure knowledge. Administrators are obliged to focus on the business of marketing their institution through the development of athletics and research funding programs, for example.
A university experience remains a dream passage for many young people. This is despite the fact that they and their parents may have to sacrifice considerably to make it possible.
In addition, the “essential lessons of a college experience” (claimed above) are not experienced by a majority of North Americans of whom less than 30% of eligible learners get a university degree.
ix: Despite the then existing belief that education did not lend itself to any kind of scientific analysis “education became a subject of university study at the end of the nineteenth century”
x: In talking about educational research: “Why has this domain of scholarly work always been regarded as something of a step-child, reluctantly tolerated at the margins of academe and rarely trusted by policy makers, practitioners, or members of the public at large?”
x-xi: “Once it was established within the university, the study of education took a new turn, a turn toward “science”.” , excessive quantification and “scientism”
xii: “It is hardly a secret that people who study and practice education are engaged in low-status work”
xii: “low status has undermined possibilities for developing a strong professional community and generative scholarly traditions”
xii: “Antieducationism also encompasses assumptions concerning the lack of knowledge, skill, ambition, and competence needed and possessed by educators-to paraphrase George Bernard Shaw, “he or she who can, does; he or she who cannot, teaches.”
xiii: “Antieducationism thus allows one to believe that excellence can be achieved in and through education even when investments in personnel, research, materials, and equipment are limited.”
4: Professional Education for Teachers: “in the 1820’s teaching became increasingly associated with a specialized form of work, and institutions offering teachers special training began to appear.”
7: in the latter half of the nineteenth century normal schools emerged as the primary institution of professional education for teachers
9: the job market for teachers increased due to the development of high schools
9: the research university came into existence at about the same time. “With these powerful and deliberate leaders at the helm, universities quickly assumed managerial roles in the development and dissemination of knowledge and in the professionalization of many different fields of service and their associated and their associated knowledge domains. It was as part of that, that universities moved increasingly to establish schools and departments of education within their own precincts.”
10: “there were more than 200 colleges or universities offering teacher preparation by 1894-95″
10:”It makes more sense to read it as evidence of university aspirations to corner new markets and, even more, to assume a regulatory role that would ensure university leadership of the full panoply of educational institutions within a particular city, state, or region-or even nationwide.”
10: “Conflict and competition resulted from the ambition shared by many university leaders to organize the nation’s multitude of schools and colleges into a more coherent, pyramid-like hierarchy with universities at the top.”
11: “even though only a very small fraction of its graduates actually went on to college, college preparation should be the common controlling purpose of the high school. This would help ensure college and university oversight of high school curricula, which was initially exercised through faculty accreditation visits and then increasingly through regional accrediting associations…”
16: “between roughly 1890 and 1920, education research emerged as an empirical, professional science, built primarily around behaviorist psychology and the techniques and ideology of quantitative measurements. Inevitably, as this approach gained acceptance, other approaches to the study of education-most important, the approach developed by John Dewey at the University of Chicago between 1894 and 1904-were pushed to the margins.”
19: “The sources of educational science are any portions of ascertained knowledge that enter into the heart, head, and hands of educators, and which, by entering in, render the performance of the educational function more enlightened, more humane, more truly educational than it was before.” – John Dewey
20: “Inspired with the zeal of missionaries, the first generations of scholars of education had been extraordinarily successful in developing a knowledge base for the school leaders they wished to counsel. In the process, they had invented educational psychology, educational testing, educational administration, the history of education, and what were called general and special (teaching) methods…”
20: early educationists “set out to create order and standards in a previously local and non-standardized domain of public concern” and were very successful. “Among other things, increasing bureaucracy in the public schools testified to that.”
24: “At issue, though unstated, was the primacy of psychology, rather than philosophy, in the study of education.”
24: “home life had shriveled, city children were left to the street…school life and work were mechanical, and mass methods that ignored individuality and even child nature were everywhere prevalent.”
26: child study became important: “all now agree that the mind can learn only what is related to other things learned before, and that we must start from the knowledge the children really have and develop this as germs.”
26: “The teacher must know two things: (1) the subject matter to be taught, and (2) the nature and capacity of the minds to which it is to be rooted.”
A school that’s all about achievement and performance is a school that’s not really about discovery and understanding. — Alfie Kohn, Schooling Beyond Measure
We expect government to be accountable . Therefore, the menu of offerings in education must be presented to the taxpayer and their universal delivery must be verified. Thus, measures of student success have been created. There are three main challenges that result.
1. What are Public Education’s Objectives?
Public education everywhere has several objectives. The core goal is usually knowledge acquisition, quite simply that students will have learned the prescribed material and be able to demonstrate their new knowledge and skills.
In the Cégep system, courses in Humanities, Physical Education, First and Second Languages are compulsory for all students. This suggests an additional set of expectations: that students be critical thinkers with a broad world view, be able to design healthy lifestyles for themselves, converse in two official languages and appreciate the contributions to culture that these languages have made . This generally defines a goal that could be called “good citizen”.
Cégep education is tuition-free. The condition, however, is that students be enrolled in a program. The program will either lead to immediate employment or to a university program with the same ultimate destination. In other words, the government wants graduates to be employable.
While there may be other expectations of public education these three are normally the main ones.
2. How to Measure Them
Of the three goals mentioned above, institutions generally choose knowledge acquisition as the one they can measure.
Unfortunately, while trying to be scientific in their measurements of student success in knowledge acquisition, they are anything but.
While the gold standard in scientific investigation is the double-blind, controlled experiment, in public education there is no control group. Furthermore, the teacher applies a treatment to a class of students and then determines its results in the form of grades.
In addition, teachers are sometimes encouraged to raise or lower their grades. The fact that this is even possible confirms that grades cannot be relied upon to measure the success of the learning experience. No self-respecting scientist would believe otherwise.
Success rates (pass rates) are direct derivatives of grades. Not only are these subject to the inherent inadequacies of grades but setting an acceptable success rate is usually arbitrary.
3. The Cost of False Acceptance
When educators do not acknowledge the underlying weakness of grades as a measure of student success, they become complicit in a deception. Continuing to do so dis-empowers them. The value of their sincere efforts and personal integrity to the institution are then diminished.
A first step in looking for a better measure of student success is to identify the full set of goals that are actually intended. Three have been mentioned above; there may be others. The process of actually defining them can be a positive experience for the institution.
An alternative approach to measurement would shift the evaluation focus from outputs to inputs. Instead of looking at grades, which are an outcome of the education process, it makes more sense to consider the elements of the process which are essential to its successful functioning.
Inputs might include: well qualified teachers, professional development, inviting spaces, useful equipment, supplies, and technology, various out-of-class support services, and effective leadership.
Inputs can be evaluated in two ways: they are either present or absent, and if present, could they be improved? Even those who insist on analyzing outputs would have to turn to the inputs to solve any apparent shortcomings they had discovered.
Governments will continue to insist on assurances of student success. In response, the institution should begin by identifying the complete set of learning goals it is trying to meet.
The second step is to define the inputs necessary to achieve those goals.
Thirdly, the institution should regularly assess the presence or absence and the quality of these inputs. Discussing inputs goes right to the question of what needs attention. It doesn’t depend on false interpretations of grades or metrics that are hard to interpret.
It also acknowledges that institutions do not control the success of their students. Clearly the students themselves are the key determiners of their own success as learners.
This shift requires honesty about grades in particular. But this honesty will liberate educators from complicity in false measures that have never served education well.
Pedagogical days, in the college environment, have historically been an occasion to supplement college teachers’ classroom experience with emerging pedagogical knowledge and teaching strategies.
It has shown itself to have limited effect on changing teaching practices because it does not resonate with most faculty members. There are two reasons. First, most college teachers are hired without any pedagogical certification or expertise. They are content specialists whose most recent educational experiences have been as students in a university environment. There, teaching practices of long standing are rarely enriched by pedagogical theory.
The second reason is that, without realizing that pedagogical knowledge is central to teaching, some teachers resent experts telling them how to teach.
Ped Days are rare occasions where the entire college community can be together. A Ped Day is therefore an opportunity to build the College’s real teaching platform, the Champlain community.
There are three underlying principles that can make this goal a reality.
We are not overstaffed at the College. This means that everyone here is essential to the mission. All groups within the College should feel welcome and find activities of specific and mutual interest.
Input and participation are essential elements. This is where the collective responsibilities for civility and the development of a healthy workplace can be addressed.
Food and hospitality are a key part of the Quebec tradition and provide an initial opportunity to connect with others. Just meeting new people helps us to create a sense of belonging to a talented team doing great work.
As an employee community of 300 people it is inevitable we will have a wide range of interests. If we free ourselves from the obligation to appear “pedagogical” we can address diverse subjects using varied formats and activities.
This certainly includes addressing pedagogical issues, both theoretical and practical. We have an evolving group of pedagogues. Supporting them is the best mechanism we have for improving the quality of teaching in our College.
Offering choice will boost enthusiasm for Ped Days and can make them events not to be missed.
We can treat people as their role or as their person. Teaching English is a role but the person who teaches it may also be a mother of three young children. Many of our colleagues have kids, some have grandchildren. Others just have dogs. 🙂
Each day their preoccupations include their work, their home, and the larger environment. Many parents worry about their children’s future in the face of a menacing climate crisis. Their own health and that of those around them is an eventual focus in everyone’ s life.
There are two issues we must address in acknowledging each other’s humanity, wellness and the environment.
We become more informed day-by-day about human wellness. Yet the workplace continues to demand more in terms of good health.
Stress is implicated in many medical and psychological problems. It also reduces people’s effectiveness. New technology actually increases the amount of work we do and ties us more closely to the workplace for longer hours.
Sitting for long periods of time, particularly in front of a computer screen, presents its own threats to health.
We must confront environmental issues, local and global. It is essential that we move beyond simple admonitions of environmental responsibility and begin to dig deeper into the details of carbon and plastic pollution. We are in the knowledge business and nowhere is knowledge more needed than in these two areas. As a community, we need to join with our students in making a deeper dive into the facts we will need in order to be a part of the solution.
Regarding the recent Ped day activities, I wanted to mention that I found them to be exceptional; kudos to all of the members who took the time to organize and present their interest in the varying workshops. It is apparent that the college is wanting and willing to listen to all, care about our health, wellness, and future at the college, and demonstrate an openness for change for the betterment of not only students, but for us as well. The only downfall was that many teachers and other members of the college were not there to benefit from the exercises. If that many people do not participate in sharing and understanding the ‘community’ efforts, then we cannot speak the same language (so to speak), understand one another’s views, and know in what direction we are heading. A real shame. I am hoping we can have more of these types of workshops, perhaps one or two main focal points to have more time to share and plot concrete findings, and have all on board.
A big THANK YOU for the time and effort made, and cheers to all who were quite innovative, worked hard with their findings while keeping us engaged, and definitely well-fed by the staff in the cafeteria who were courteous and attentive!
Designing great learning experiences is what great teachers do. Educators have much to gain, and to offer, when they define their roles as creative work. Teachers, in particular, can keep their practice motivating by choosing an energizing definition of teaching— designing learning experiences for learners.
With time, experienced teachers can begin to feel that their work has lost its appeal. They may find their teaching activities repetitive or that their students seem less motivated than they used to be. Boredom and frustration can lead eventually to burnout. To assure that their teaching practice remains vital teachers must start with a good definition of teaching.
Many people believe that teaching is about the “transfer of information”. However, this traditional model makes teaching a static, repetitive process in which the teacher is simply the pipeline between the sources of knowledge and the student destination. This belief can lead teachers to design learning experiences which are boring. As a result students may be unwilling to apply serious effort to the learning.
Designing Learning Experiences
Most teachers create lessons. These range from highly teacher-centered to highly student-centered depending upon what we ask students to do. If they are asked to listen and take notes the lesson is a lecture. Alternatively, teachers can design problem-solving activities which engage students in finding solutions. And there are many variations in between.
From a student perspective lessons are experiences. It makes sense, therefore, to think of lesson planning as designing learning experiences. This will change what you do.
There are two sets of principles you can draw on in becoming a learning experience designer. The first consists of pedagogical principles.
Pedagogical Principles for Designing Great Educational Experiences
The work of researchers like Jean Piaget suggests that learning is an act of construction. In this model, learners have an existing base of knowledge. When they learn, they build new knowledge onto this base. It is a bit like building an addition onto a house.
This means that the learner is in complete control of the learning. A student can choose to learn or not. Consequently, any definition of teaching must include the teacher’s role as an indirect influence on students’ learning. Teachers lead the planned learning experiences but their influence on actual learning is always indirect.
The Professional Teacher
It is important to note that a student’s unwillingness to learn doesn’t exempt the teacher from a professional commitment to teach well. Teaching professionals are always looking for the best way. Teaching, therefore, is a continuous process of design, testing, and improving learning experiences.
The Active Learning model hinges on engagement and is a reaction to traditional lecture methods. According to the model students are intellectually active when they engage with the subject matter. Supporters of AL are fond of saying, “Talking is not teaching and listening is not learning.” The traditional lecture is limited in its ability to fully engage students.
Learners must actively probe the subject under study in order to arrive at a deep and lasting understanding. This does not occur when students simply take lecture notes and then feed information back in tests or papers.
In addition, Active Learning activities should address the “real world”. This means that learning experiences should connect to issues outside the classroom rather than revolve around memorizing and doing exercises.
Benjamin Bloom’s ranking of intellectual activities is one of the most fundamental tools available to teachers at all levels.
Shown here is the updated version of the taxonomy. Educators generally accept the principal that teachers should design learning experiences at various levels of intellectual challenge. They should emphasize, where possible, the higher ones.
A course containing only Remember level activities will limit students to memorizing facts and figures. They would find this course incredibly boring. Such a course would not encourage or deepen their understanding of important concepts.
Many teachers still find it challenging to engage students at the Create level. There are several reasons for this.
Teachers believe that they are expected to provide the course content. If they share the role it is only with text books and other educational resources.
Teachers are the experts on how content should be presented. Students will not be able to create presentations that are as effective.
The course content is already defined so there is no point having students produce material which risks lying outside the curriculum.
All Professionals are Designers
Professional teachers learn from their practice. Each change they bring to the learning experiences they design produces new evidence about what works and what does not. This process of constant experimentation is clearly a creative one. It drives other other professionals as well. All professionals are designers.
Physicians design and revise programs of diagnosis and treatment for their patients. Lawyers design legal strategies to help their clients. Accountants create financial plans and revise them to meet their clients’ changing needs. Architects design living and working spaces for various uses by people.
The professional teacher is a designer as well.
Designing Great Educational Experiences—Some Ingredients of Great Experiences
The second set of principles designing teachers can apply are experiential. These come from what we know about ourselves.
Elementary school teachers all seem to know how important the classroom environment is in creating effective learning experiences.
At the high school level the physical learning space often becomes less vibrant. In fact, because students usually move from class to class the classrooms tend to be similar and minimal in design. Nonetheless, older students do respond to the physical environment they learn in. While the elementary classroom can feel stimulating and offer each student a space that is theirs high school classrooms often imply that it really doesn’t matter who you; any other group of visitors would be just as welcome.
Unfortunately, at the university level both the physical context and often pedagogical design, have even lower priority. AT this level teachers usually revert to the traditional role of information presenter. The physical environment defines a one-way dialog between presenter and audience. Anyone absent will not be missed.
Here are some questions to consider.
What does it feel like to enter the location in which you teach?
Could you meet your students in other spaces? Sometimes this includes the outdoors.
Can you enhance the space in any way? Could you make it more comfortable? Can you adjust the lighting or the seating or otherwise improve the comfort of the space?
Does it feel like a place for learning?
Is the space cared for?
A learner’s personal experiences and their experiencing of world events can change their level of engagement in learning activities. A well designed learning experience allows room for flexibility and spontaneous changes of plans. If there has been a significant event in the community, whether disturbing or exciting, it may deserve some attention in class. This acknowledges that the participants in the lesson are people, not just students. Students have good days and bad days too.
People are context. Every class has its unique character and it can change from day to day.
Responsibility for psychological currents in the classroom falls overwhelmingly on the teacher. Blindly plowing ahead in the face of some form of disruption denies the recognition of students as human beings and the organic nature of a group of human beings.
By adulthood we have all acquired some
your class or my class
Concern for these elements is part of the design process for learning experiences. Sometimes, of course, the unexpected will necessitate a spontaneous change of plans. Interestingly, this kind of change often produces surprisingly satisfying results.
Here are some questions to consider.
Do students have an opportunity to get acquainted with other participants, to discover their strengths and talents? Do these opportunities continue?
Is there time to ease into the lesson, gathering scattered minds together and acknowledging any elephants in the room?
Is there a civility which allows free, unintimidated sharing of ideas?
Does respect prevail?
Is there an atmosphere of inquiry?
Engaging the Senses
We are an eye-dominant species. Nonetheless, our other senses enhance our ability to understand and appreciate objects, ideas, and concepts. Many people develop other senses as compensation when, for example, they are visually impaired.
There is considerable evidence that people who are blind or deaf acquire enhanced abilities in other areas, largely due to brain plasticity. Although learners are capable of contacting the world in several different ways we tend to rely heavily on printed texts in teaching. This is at the expense of providing other ways of understanding and appreciating our reality. These other modes of contact are what we often use outside the learning environment. It makes little sense for our teaching to exclude them.
Here are some questions to consider.
Will sound play a role in your teaching?
Are there things to touch?
Will participants move around in the space?
Building a community revolves around respect, and respect engenders trust. This allows learners to let down the guard they use to protect themselves against being attacked, embarrassed, humiliated, or otherwise made to feel inferior. There are several reasons why creating a sense of community in the learning space is essential.
Most teacher training programs include Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs . It is a longstanding theory that explains the priorities of the various kinds of needs human beings have.
Self-actualization – desire to become the most that one can be
The theory suggests that we cannot have our needs met at some level if the needs at lower levels are not met first . We will always be preoccupied with having the lower-ranking needs met. For example, we will have trouble learning (self-actualization) when we are hungry, fearful, or unconnected to those around us.
Feeling part of a community in the learning space can help a learner meet these needs and then be able to address learning.
Active Learning and other popular learning strategies encourage teachers to have students work in groups to solve problems, to collaborate.
When students work together they can encounter the same challenges faced by any group. We can better prepare students to deal with the task of working effectively in groups by building a sense of community.
Overwriting Bad History
Students arrive in the learning space with a variety of past experiences. If they have struggled with unmet needs in their past educational experiences or in their home life a positive community experience can support a successful re-orientation toward learning.
Here are some questions to consider.
Will participants appear to be having a good time causing others to want to join in?
Do you use ice breakers to create comfort among participants?
Is there an established climate of respect?
Rewarding the Relationship
In an electronic age Social Media are constantly soliciting students for their attention. They compete particularly for the attention of young people. In fact, attention has become a commodity which has a dollar value in the ubiquitous world of Social Media.
Business models now guide the evolution of Social Media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and others. Among the negative consequences of business motives is the addictive behavior that it deliberately generates, particularly in young people. It is important for teachers to understand Social Media’s success. These sites compete for our limited attention by creating engaging experiences.
In order to attract attention Social Media platforms trade on our craving for social approval: feeling connected, validated, and liked. Attention turns out to be a commodity with a high value to corporate marketers.
The SM platforms invoke psychology in their pursuit of attention. “Likes” and other shows of approval give us random rewards which are very effective in creating a fleeting feeling of pleasure. These random rewards keep us coming back for more in much the same way a slot machine does. Some platforms even build in deliberate delays between screen updates to heighten the intensity of expectation.
SM members who read a message and know that the sender has been notified may feel obliged to reply. And the original sender may linger online awaiting that likely response. The net effect: more attention to the platform, more attention to sell to marketers.
One site uses “streaks”, advancing red lines to display the number of days since two users interacted. This can create anxiety if the streak gets too long. Some SM users ask friends to babysit their streaks while on holiday, keeping the streak alive.
Many web sites encourage visitors to become members or subscribers. In addition, the new member is advised to allow “alerts” or push notifications. When these messages arrive the member is likely to interrupt whatever she is doing and thereby be subject to frequent distraction.
The compulsive practice of seeking a reward by responding to Social Media’s prompts means building one’s life around avoiding discomfort instead of focusing on things that give joy.
The random psychological rewards provided by Social Media work very well in grabbing large amounts of attention, particularly from young people. With this as background teachers have to seriously address the question, “Am I also trying to attract my students’ attention?” And if so, “What rewards can students expect in return for their attention?”
The rewards of educational success are generally deferred: career and income, for example. What are the immediate rewards of a lesson? This is an important question. Is there something that brings a class to a rewarding conclusion? Was there a Eureka moment in which something significant was revealed? Did your students feel they accomplished something challenging, either individually or as a group? Did the time spent (the attention given) lead to some satisfying insight or some newly acquired capacity? In short, was the value of the learning experience equal to the value of the attention demanded and were the rewards immediately felt?
Unfortunately, some teachers dismiss this question by putting all responsibility for student engagement on the student. Learning experience designers, on the other hand, start with the belief that the experiences they design should reward student attention.
Feeling empowered is a strong reward. So it is important that learners feel they have accomplished something significant.
Here are some questions to consider.
Will students experience a reward for their attention?
Do you feel that it is your responsibility to ensure these rewards are present?
In thinking about the specific content you teach, does it contain something you find rewarding?
Babies learn quickly that, in order to get what they want, it would be very useful to do two things. If they could talk they could tell the grownups what they want. If they could walk they could just go and get it.
For many years we have sent young children to school where their newly acquired skills are devalued in favor of sitting still and being quiet. Students who struggle with these restrictions are sometimes drugged into complying. Students who make it to high school without taming their desire to speak and move about often drop out in frustration.
The Natural Movement of the Body and Frequent Changes of Position
Research is now suggesting that the body has a need to move spontaneously throughout the day in order to preserve health and enable concentration.
“The standard day at work or school is spent sitting and the amount of time we spend sitting has increased enormously over the last 35 years compared to what is healthy for the human body. One obvious result of this lack of activity is that the muscles throughout our body do not get enough use. Spontaneous and regular muscle contractions throughout the whole body are an important part of the circulation system and furnish the brain with the oxygen, proteins and hormones it requires for concentration.
To meet these supply requirements, the brain subconsciously sends signals to the muscles to move. The rigid furniture and environments that we find in office environments and schools today hinder this self-organized movement.” —Aquest Design
The importance of spontaneous physical movement is now more generally recognized for younger students. Nonetheless, at higher levels of schooling we are quick to assume that the need has disappeared. Students in higher education, particularly, are expected to sit in rigid seating for prolonged periods of time. The challenges for success in higher education should derive from the work itself and not from the conditions under which it is done.
Our need for spontaneous movement includes the opportunity to express states of happiness and joy.
Is there a learning narrative that starts somewhere and goes somewhere? Did students arrive at a new destination by the end of the lesson? When designing a lesson it is helpful to think about the “journey” students will make during the experience. Will they leave your class feeling they have moved forward in understanding, skill, or appreciation?
It is difficult to know how well students integrated the material explored during a lesson. Do you ever ask? A five-minute survey at the end of a class can:
reveal, for you and for them, the degree of understanding that was achieved
encourage students to reflect on what they learned
let students know that their learning success is important to you
The “Ah-Ha!” Moment
In designing an activity it is also useful to think about Ah-Ha! moments. Does your learning experience contain some surprising revelations or concepts that suddenly become clear? Will participants get the main point of the activity? By the end will they have discovered something important?
Most lessons go right to the main topic without setting any context. By setting context first you create reasons for learning and can place the main idea as the prize worth waiting for.
Here is an example from Nursing:
In interaction with students explore the meaning of “pressure”. Where do we encounter “pressure”? (In many different contexts.) How would you define it? How is pressure increased or reduced? Now let’s talk about high blood pressure.
High blood pressure is a relevant topic in a Nursing program. But the underlying concept, “pressure”, is universal and has enormous importance. Having understood this context students will be able to predict many of the main issues associated with hypertension. Enabling learners to generate the key knowledge elements themselves rather than receiving them from a textbook or the teacher engages them. It also creates a narrative in which the destination (high blood pressure) is eventually revealed. Ah-Ha!
What photographs or other memorabilia will they end up with at the end of a lesson?
Having students listen to a lecture and try to write coherent notes has been shown to be an ineffective approach to teaching and learning. If not lecture notes, what will be the physical take-away of a lesson be?
Many students now use their cell phone cameras to record board work and other reminders of the lesson. Could there be other reminders that they could take from a lesson? Perhaps they could leave with a card with an acronym, or a reminder of some important process that was explored? And of course photographs of board notes and drawings, preferably their own board work and drawings.
One of the fine points of teaching involves “keeping it simple”. This is important on two levels. First, does the key focus of the lesson stand out above everything else? Sometimes teachers devote too much time to the administrative details associated with their lessons: organizing for activities, collecting and returning assignments, explaining rules and grading, for example. While these are important we should not allow them to dominate the learning experience. Keep it simple.
At another level when studying a particular idea it is important to know when to stop developing additional connections, digging into more detail, or adding more examples. The key concepts need to stand out. At the end of the lesson would your students be able to easily identify its main purpose?
End on a High Note
Assuring the learning experience ends on a high note requires, first of all, that you are attentive to time. The class will not end on a high note if you run out of time and don’t make it to the rewarding conclusion you planned.
Is there time at the end for a quiet word or a loud cheer? It is an excellent idea to get some feedback on how things went.
Creating a Platform
Each learning experience you design contributes to the building of a learning platform. This platform supports students in taking on greater learning challenges. Their learning experiences should lead them to the creation of unique expressions of their expanding fields of understanding.
We treasure what we create. Our creations help to define us. The entire set of learning experiences you create are the platform from which students can develop and express their unique perspectives. Their creations are a reward for their efforts in learning and will encourage them to continue learning forever.
“The total 2018-2019 cost of attending Harvard College without financial aid is $46,340 for tuition and $67,580 for tuition, room, board, and fees combined”.
The result is that many students accumulate insurmountable levels of debt.
“Americans owe $1.5 trillion in higher education debt, a burden that weighs down their dreams and the U.S. economy. The Federal Reserve says millennials are now less likely to buy homes than young people were in 2005, and even senior citizens find themselves still making payments on their student loans.”
Many European countries offer free or low-cost university education, often in English. Mexico, Brazil, and even economic rival, China offer competitive educational opportunities. One would expect that the US would want to make its higher education more accessible to its own citizens in a bid to maintain its economic dominance, trading on the strong reputations of it universities.
Income-Sharing Agreement (ISA)
But no. Why solve the problem when you can invent something more insidious? American investors are turning students with debt into investments.
In return for an investment in their education students promise to pay investors a percentage of their future earnings. For example, one graduate of Purdue University, presently earning $50,000, pays her investor $279 per month, and this for eight and a half years. This could go up or down as her salary changes. It could go to zero if she becomes unemployed.
This exploitation of American students necessarily adds a layer of discrimination to a system already overwhelmed by different forms of it. Not all students are of equal risk and so, often, the university is involved in rating a student’s investment attractiveness.
The following table shows how different educational specializations are rated for investment consideration.
Share of Income Owned
Term, in years
Young People In America
As with Health Care solutions, the American psyche seems to require the intervention of some corporate interest. Education in the 21st century is clearly of top importance in all nations of the world. Yet many Americans can’t proceed directly from the needs of its own citizens (in this case mainly young people) to some of sort of aid or solution to the important problems the group faces. There must be some opportunity for capital investors to score profits, usually substantial.
The ISA is abhorrent as it views university students as immediate sources of profit and not as human beings, people who can contribute much to their country. The fact that many universities are complicit is scandalous.
Wake up America! Taken alongside recent experiences with un-redressed school shootings, limp objection to the separation of parents and children at the southern border, and the already untenable financial demands on US college students young people must be wondering how well loved they are in their own land.
Interest may be one of the most fundamental, most important concepts in education.
When we scramble from one strategy to another in our pursuit of a modern, successful education system we miss the importance of interest. It is interest that drives discovery in the evolution of human understanding.
Student success, one of our most central educational goals eventually leads to a discussion of what motivates students to learn. The answer is interest.
But teachers will claim that not everything they are obliged to teach is interesting. Then they fall back into a debate about ways to motivate students. What tricks can teachers learn to make the subject seem more interesting? When students drop out of the education system prematurely we once again point to the failure to make learning interesting to them.
But the pleasure of learning new things is inherent in our human nature. Just watch young children. Adding games or play to the learning environment, while often completely legitimate, is at other times a poor deception which tries to fool students into learning. This often results in a dumbing-down of challenging concepts and skills. It also produces a host of gimmicks.
Among the greatest deceptions is the marketing of technology as an essential tool for motivating students. Teachers have been told to “integrate technology into teaching” because that’s what young people like. However, this form of pandering is no more likely to motivate students than the use of chalk and blackboards.
Some educators transfer the responsibility for motivation to the student. They would say, “You can lead students to water but you can’t make them drink”. While it is true that learners do control their own motivation, leaving them solely responsible for it is an abdication of professional teaching responsibility.
Motivation is about interest. Young children, for example, are always interested in something. Starting school is often the beginning of a process aimed at focusing their attention on things that are important to others. This is a process that can overlook the importance of genuine interest. Getting students to perform at grade level becomes the reason for them learning anything. This has little motivational value for young learners.
Any attempt to understand the motivation to learn comes back to interest. This is a very important word. It defines not only a state of curiosity but also something of value, as in “I have a vested interest in the future of the planet.” It also represents a reward for investing, as in “interest income”.
This raises the obvious question, “Where does interest come from?” Can we affect another person’s level of interest? When a child, or anyone, is truly interested they will invest considerable effort in understanding and doing. In a typical educational program, spanning several years, there are many different things to study. Is it possible for a learner to be genuinely interested in all, or even most, of them?
The Latin word interest means “it is important” and the prefix inter implies a connection between things. This suggests that connection is central to the interest something can create in us.
Most systems of education presume that proper sequencing is essential to connecting concepts and skills. Hence the lock-step advancement through grades or levels — in learning arithmetic, for example, before higher mathematics. But good sequencing is surely no guarantee of student interest.
Learning might be enhanced if the subject being studied was connected to the learner’s personal experience. However, through decades of public education large scale customization has been largely unattainable. (It is comforting to note that there is now a discussion of “personalized medicine“. One might hope that it will spill over into education.)
Is there a universal kind of connection that can link any subject of study to something important for any learner? That would be the solution to the problem, if it exists.
Children are surrounded by adults who are able to do interesting things. For children the main goal is to become an adult with all the rights, privileges, and possibilities. Everything they learn brings them closer to that goal. They need to speak the languages of their parents and of their peers in order to demand the things they want and to communicate with those who can help them. They need to be able to walk in order to approach things that are attractive.
As children near adulthood their learning priorities shift. What is interesting to them has changed but it is still interest that is driving them. In structured public education we seem intent on trying to interest learners in what interests us. We invent the programs and curricula and set the markers that show progress. We should not be surprised then when learner interest is lacking and we are running off to a conference on how to motivate students.
This kind of experience leads teachers to become disconnected from the very subjects that once attracted them. They now define themselves as the expert who must create the motivation for their students’ learning or, in the worst case, simply throw the responsibility for motivation back on the student.
This widespread failure is largely a result of being focused on the outputs of the educational process, at the expense of the inputs. The outputs are the grades and success rates that are contrived to measure progress, but which often measure very little. The inputs are the inventory of elements provided by the educational system. The list varies but might include qualified teachers, solid pedagogy, physical environment, class size, and numerous other elements. More on this.
The more education authorities aspire to meet the educational needs of their changing world the more they risk losing touch with the genuine interests of their clientele. Learners live in the same world as educational decision makers. Allowing educational experiences to build upon genuine learner interest doesn’t seem like a great risk to take and will likely lead to real student success.